Over the past four years, Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) and hydrogen have emerged as two of the most promising clean energy solutions in the United States. Both are crucial to decarbonizing industries, transportation, and power generation, but their adoption has followed very different paths.

‍
While RNG has seen rapid integration into existing energy systems, hydrogen—despite significant federal support—faces infrastructure challenges and market uncertainties. So, how do they compare in terms of uptake, usage, regulations, and retrofitting needs? Let’s break it down.

‍

Uptake: RNG is Scaling Faster

RNG (Biomethane):

Since 2020, biomethane production in the U.S. has surged, with over 275 facilities producing 3+ billion cubic meters (bcm) of RNG in 2023, nearly quadrupling since 2015. RNG is already playing a key role in the transportation sector, fueled by programs like California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) and the EPA’s Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS).

• Key sectors driving RNG growth: Transportation, utilities, industrial heating
• Adoption speed: Rapid, as it integrates seamlessly into existing pipelines
• Market demand: High, due to compliance incentives and corporate sustainability goals

‍
Hydrogen:

The U.S. has ramped up investment in hydrogen, but its uptake has been slower than RNG. Most U.S. hydrogen production still comes from fossil fuels via steam methane reforming (SMR), and green hydrogen (produced via electrolysis using renewables) remains expensive and limited in supply. Despite the $8 billion investment in hydrogen hubs under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, demand for clean hydrogen has yet to scale up significantly.

• Key sectors pushing hydrogen growth: Heavy industry, aviation, and long-haul trucking
• Adoption speed: Slower due to infrastructure and cost challenges
• Market demand: Uncertain, as industries hesitate to invest without cost reductions
  ‍

Winner: RNG – While both fuels have seen growth, RNG has already been widely adopted, while hydrogen is still largely in the pilot phase.

‍

Use Cases: Where is RNG vs. Hydrogen Gaining Traction?

RNG: Powering Transportation & Industrial Operations

• RNG is mainly used for vehicle fleets, such as trucks and buses running on Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) and Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG).
• Utilities are blending RNG into natural gas pipelines to reduce carbon intensity.
• The industrial sector is using RNG for boiler and process heating applications, requiring no major retrofits to switch from fossil gas.

‍
Hydrogen: Heavy Industry & Future Transport

• Hydrogen is emerging as a clean alternative for steel, cement, and ammonia production.
• The aviation and maritime industries are exploring hydrogen-powered aircraft and ships.
• Fuel cell hydrogen vehicles (like Toyota’s Mirai and Hyundai’s Nexo) exist but face limited fueling infrastructure.

‍
Winner: RNG (for now) – Hydrogen’s potential is vast, but RNG is already being used at scale in critical sectors.

‍

Regulatory Ease: RNG vs. Hydrogen Market Incentives

RNG Benefits from Strong Regulatory Support

• Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS): California’s LCFS provides financial incentives for RNG in transportation.
• Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS): RNG qualifies for D3 Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs) under the EPA program, driving high demand.
• State-level incentives: Many U.S. states are mandating natural gas utilities to blend RNG into pipelines.

‍
Hydrogen: Uncertainty in Regulations

• Hydrogen tax credits: The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) introduced a $3/kg production tax credit for green hydrogen, making it more competitive.
• Hydrogen hubs: The DOE is investing $8 billion to create regional hydrogen economies.
• Unclear demand signals: Unlike RNG, hydrogen lacks strong regulatory mandates, making companies hesitant to invest.
  ‍

Winner: RNG – RNG enjoys more immediate financial and compliance incentives, whereas hydrogen’s policy framework is still evolving.

‍

Retrofitting Needs: RNG Easily Integrates, Hydrogen Requires Infrastructure Overhaul

RNG: Drop-in Replacement for Fossil Gas

• Minimal infrastructure changes – RNG can be injected directly into existing natural gas pipelines.
• No major retrofits needed for vehicles using CNG or LNG.
• Easier adoption for industries already using natural gas for heating and power.

‍
Hydrogen: Infrastructure Overhaul Required

• Pipelines: Hydrogen has different chemical properties than natural gas, requiring new infrastructure or expensive retrofits to avoid pipeline embrittlement.
• Fueling stations: Hydrogen fuel stations are rare, costing millions per station compared to RNG/CNG stations.
• End-use compatibility: Many industrial processes require new hydrogen-ready burners, fuel cells, or turbines before adoption.
  ‍

Winner: RNG – RNG fits into existing infrastructure, whereas hydrogen needs extensive investment before widespread deployment.

‍

Final Verdict:

RNG is currently leading the clean energy transition due to its seamless integration into existing infrastructure, making it the most accessible option for immediate emissions reductions. Meanwhile, hydrogen holds significant long-term potential, but widespread adoption depends on major infrastructure investments and cost reductions. Looking ahead, RNG is expected to continue expanding in transportation and utility decarbonization, while hydrogen will gradually gain traction in heavy industry and long-haul transport - though its breakthrough moment may still be a decade away.